1. Hippolytus, Refutations.
There was when naught was: nay, even that "naught" was not aught of things
that are. But nakedly, conjecture and mental quibbling apart, there was absolutely not
even the one. And when i use the term "was" I do not mean to say that it was
;but merely to give some suggestion of what i wish to indicate, I use the expression
"there was absolutely naught". Naught was, neither matter, nor substance, nor
voidness of substance, nor simplicity, nor impossibility of composition, nor
inconceptibility, imperceptibility, neither man, nor angel, nor God ; in fine, anything at
all for which man has ever found a name, nor by any operation ehich falls within range of
his perception or conception.
2. Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 4.81.2-4.83.2
{Basilides, in Book 23 of his "Commentaries," speaks of those who suffer
punishment as martyrs, with the following words:} I believe that all who experience the
so-called tribulations must have committed sins other than what they realize, and so have
been brought to this good end. Through the kindness of that which leads each one of them
about, they are actually accused of an extraneous set of charges so they might not have to
suffer as confessed criminals convicted of crimes, nor be reviles as adulterers or
murderers, but rather might suffer because they are disposed by nature to be Christian.
And this encourages them to think that they are not suffering. But even if a person should
happen to suffer without having sinned at all - which is rare - still, that person's
suffering is not caused by the plotting of some power. Rather, it is analogous to the
sufffering of a new-born baby, who seems not to have sinned.
{Then, farther along, he adds:} A new-born baby, then, has never sinned before; or more
precisely it has not actually committed any sins, but within itself it has the activity of
sinning. Whenever it experiences suffering, it receives benefit, profiting by many
unpleasant experiences. Just so, if by chance a grown man has not sinned by deed and yet
suffers, he suffered the suffering for the same reason as the new-born baby: he has within
him sinfulness, and the only reason he has not sinned (in deed) is because he has not had
the occasion to do so. Thus not sinning cannot be imputed to him. Indeed, someone who
intends to commit adultery is an adulterer even without succeeding in the act, and someone
who intends to commit murder is a murderer even without being able to commit the act. Just
so, if I see the aforementioned sinless person suffering despite having done no wrong, I
must call that person evil by intent to sin. For I will say anything rather than call
providence evil. {Then, farther along, he speaks of the Lord outright as of a human being:
Nevertheless, let us suppose that you leave aside all these matters and set out to
embarrass me by referring to certain figures, saying perhaps, "And consequently
so-and-so must have sinned, since he suffered!" If you permit, I shall say that he
did not sin, but was like the new-born baby that suffers. But if you press the argument, I
shall say that any human being that you can name is human; God is righteous. For no one is
pure of uncleanness, as someone once said. {Actually, Basilides' presupposition is that
the soul previously sinned in another life and undergoes its punishment in the present
one. Excellent souls are punished honorably, by martyrdom; other kinds are purified by
some other appropriate punishment.
3. Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 4.86.1
We assume that one part of the so-called will of God is to love all; a second is to
desire nothing; and a third is to hate nothing.
4. Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans 1015B
Indeed, the Apostle (Paul) has said, "I was once alive apart from the law,"
[Rom 7:9] at some time or other. That is (Paul means), before I came into this body, I
lived in the kind of body that is not subject to the law: the body of a domestic animal or
a bird.